On Friday, October 07, 2011 11:36:24 PM Frank Ellermann wrote: > On 7 October 2011 17:34, Hilda Fontana wrote: > > Thanks Murray and everyone for your input. I shall put a draft > > together with these changes and get it posted as soon as I can. > > > >> Please let me know if I have any of it wrong. > >> > >> New text: “This memo registers an extension report type to ARF > >> for use in reporting messages that fail one or more authentication > >> checks performed on receipt of a message > > [...] > > Maybe s/suthentication/authorization or authentication/ to address > one concern of Doug Otis. I'd really prefer to stay out of these > terminology nits, but if adding 20 characters helps to get rid of > one recycled vintage 2006 dispute...
The header field we are basing this on is called authentication results. That ship already sailed. Changing it to something else will be more confusing for everyone !Doug. -1 Scott K _______________________________________________ marf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
