On 20/Nov/11 07:52, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> The updated version has been posted.  Please review it (or at least
> its diffs) soon for correctness based on WGLC input as I’d like to get
> it on its way to the IESG.

Three quick notes:

* Section 3.3, 1st paragraph
I'd s/could be used/can be used/.  I'm not sure on the exact meaning
of "incumbent"; as that concept is better explained in the last
paragraph of Appendix A, the second sentence here may be redundant.

* Section 3.3, 2nd paragraph
The reference seems incorrect.  Isn't it RFC 6449 that describes the
establishment of bilateral agreements between report producers and
consumers?

This I-D expands section 8.5 of RFC 5965.  A reverse-reference should
be written as such, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COMEFROM :-)

* Appendix A
Please s/email service provider/mailbox provider/.
_______________________________________________
marf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf

Reply via email to