Folks, Both of the drafts we've seen discussed in the last couple of days have gone through a working group last call (in one case, twice), and what little feedback we got had been incorporated. Then we start IETF-wide last call, and now we get another round of substantive comments from working group participants. This might cause the AD to send it back to the working group for more editing and another WGLC.
I'm sure I don't need to tell you that this is a little frustrating for the co-chairs. By the time a document goes to IETF-wide last call, we should be supporting it, not still picking at it. If you think it's too early for us to have sent it to the IESG, that means we didn't have any input from the rest of you to indicate more work was needed. Please take the time to review and comment on documents before or at least during the WGLC. Don't wait. Thanks, -MSK, as co-chair
_______________________________________________ marf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
