Hi Frank,
At 08:48 07-12-2011, Frank Ellermann wrote:
It is rather strange to close a WG when an almost-ready I-D exists,
The W generally implies "working". There was a WGLC on
draft-ietf-marf-redaction. Six people, including the WG Chairs,
commented on the draft. The WG co-chair commented [1] on the lack of
substantive and timely document reviews.
An almost-ready I-D is not good enough. The WG co-chairs have to
demonstrate to the Responsible AD that the work is moving forward and
that the deliverables are receiving adequate review to be ready for
publication. Obviously, the WG co-chairs can only do that if the WG
participants actually participate in the work.
Regards,
-sm
1. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/marf/current/msg01527.html
_______________________________________________
marf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
