> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Scott > Kitterman > Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2012 3:11 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [marf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-marf-authfailure-report- > 09.txt > > I'm sorry I didn't notice this before, but I think that: > > spf: The evaluation of the author domain's SPF record produced a > "fail", "softfail", "temperror" or "permerror" result. > > should also include "none". For some policy scenarios that would be > considered a failure, so we ought to be able to express it.
Wouldn't you assert "fail" in that case? _______________________________________________ marf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
