In
<f5833273385bb34f99288b3648c4f06f19c6c15...@exch-c2.corp.cloudmark.com>,
on 01/06/2012
at 12:59 PM, "Murray S. Kucherawy" <[email protected]> said:
>So two questions:
>1) Is that a reasonable reply?
Yes. The question of specifying a particular hash has been hashed <g>
to death here, and the consensus seems clear.
>2) Should the above be added as an Appendix?
Yes.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
Atid/2 <http://patriot.net/~shmuel>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
_______________________________________________
marf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
