John Levine <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>You say to use a null bounce address and a HELO with a domain that
>>>produces an SPF Pass. I say use whatever bounce address you want,
>but
>>>be sure that it produces an SPF Pass. I don't see any practical
>>>advantage to requiring a null bounce address. If it's not null, and
>>>the r= address doesn't work, the reporter might get the report
>bounced
>>>back, but if I were a reporter I'd prefer to know if my reports were
>>>going into the void so I could stop sending them.
>>
>>The advantage of null mail from is no bounce loops.
>
>Right, and the disadvantage is no feedback if it's bouncing.
>
>>How would you feel about SHOULD use null mail from (with EHLO/HELO SPF
>pass), but
>>MUST avoid mail loops and Mail From, if not null, MUST pass SPF?
>
>Make it MAY use null bounce address and we have a deal. And whether
>or not it's null, it MUST pass SPF.
>
Sounds good.
Scott K
_______________________________________________
marf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
