I've asked for a number of people external to the working group who have experience with SPF to review this draft, including multiple reviews on the spf-discuss mailing list. Most of the comments have been general, like "looks much easier to implement that the exists: processing you'd have to use now to get feedback".
I got this review today. Comments in line. Scott K > Subject: Re: (Private) [spf-discuss] Review of > draft-ietf-marf-spf-reporting Date: Friday, February 03, 2012, 05:52:14 > PM > From: Commerco WebMaster <[email protected]> > To: Scott Kitterman <[email protected]> > > Scott, > > The draft looks good. > > That said, looking at things from the standpoint of an implementing > user, I typically like to see more in the way of examples in the RFCs. > > While the examples in Appendix B - B.1. and B.2. are great, it would be > nice to include a couple of logical variants that someone trying to > implement SPF might want to set up in the real world. > > In other words starting with an example of no mail authorized - > > v=spf1 -all > > to a simple IP4 case - > > v=spf1 ip4:192.168.10.1 ip4:192.168.20.1 -all > > and some other possible variations might help implementers better > understand their possible choices, given that SPF offers quite a few > ways to acceptably configure a DNS record. I'm always a fan of examples, so I can add some more. > One last thought, since there are two ways to implement the DNS RR (via > TXT and SPF), perhaps that might get a mention somewhere. I think it's probably not necessary since this is within an SPF record and not about how the record as a whole is created or published. Also, since the type SPF RR has almost no deployment, I'm afraid it might confuse things. > Best, > > Alan Maitland > > On 2/3/2012 3:33 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote: > > I think this is getting close to ready, so I would appreciate it if > > people here would review the draft and provide comments: > > > > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-marf-spf-reporting/?include > > _text=1 > > > > Thanks. > > > > Scott K _______________________________________________ marf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
