In
<f5833273385bb34f99288b3648c4f06f19c9a7d...@exch-c2.corp.cloudmark.com>,
on 02/08/2012
at 12:26 PM, "Murray S. Kucherawy" <[email protected]> said:
>It seems to me that providing a mechanism to tell a report generator
>to knock it off certainly does fit within the second part of that
>admonition. Think of the extreme case where a report generator is
>mailbombing some address extracted by heuristics.
If it's sending only one report per abusive message received and
sending it to the owner of the source IP then it's not mailbombing.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
Atid/2 <http://patriot.net/~shmuel>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
_______________________________________________
marf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
