In
<f5833273385bb34f99288b3648c4f06f19c9a7d...@exch-c2.corp.cloudmark.com>,
on 02/08/2012
at 10:42 AM, "Murray S. Kucherawy" <[email protected]> said:
>Which document, and which normative uses, are you asking us to
>review?
I was thinking of draft-ietf-marf-as-07.txt, but I was suggesting that
we be cautious about specifying MUST in general. In fact, I wonder
whether we should include the justification as part of any draft using
MUST, or at least in the discussion.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
Atid/2 <http://patriot.net/~shmuel>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
_______________________________________________
marf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
