>> A last-minute rewrite of a couple of sections of draft-ietf-marf-as was >> submitted. The feeling is that Sections 7 and 8 (especially the latter) >> had become too verbose and confusing, and had the feel of micromanagement. >> The proposed text is rather more general while still attempting to put the >> working group's main message into the hands of feedback operators. > > This is a substantial change and I don't think it is reasonable to assume that > any working group consensus established during the recently completed last > call would apply to it.
I agree, and I will want to hear from at least all the participants who made WGLC comments, before accepting this version. So far, we've heard from Scott and Alessandro, who aren't happy with the changes. That's likely to mean that the document isn't ready to go yet, and that we need more work to re-achieve consensus on a last-call version. Barry, document shepherd _______________________________________________ marf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
