On 14/Feb/12 20:12, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: >> From: ietf.org On Behalf Of Alessandro Vesely >> >>>> The third MIME part of the message is either of type "message/rfc822" >>>> (as defined in [MIME-TYPES]) or "text/rfc822-headers" (as defined in >>>> [REPORT]) and contains a copy of the entire header block from the >>>> original message. This part MUST be included (contrary to [REPORT], >>>> which makes it optional). >>> >>> The synthesis option handles this, if we want to go that way. >> >> Which "synthesis option"? > > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/marf/current/msg02109.html
Ah, that. I'd prefer to avoid it... I foolishly though there was a possibility to apply an update (or errata) recursively to all RFCs derived from an updated (corrected) format. Probably, it is an error of authfailure-report to have the paragraph quoted above --almost equal to the 5965's text that John corrected yesterday. Is it necessary to have it published before correcting it? _______________________________________________ marf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
