He's right, we got them confused on that line. Suggest hold for update.
On Mon, 30 Jul 2018, RFC Errata System wrote:
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5965, "An Extensible Format for Email Feedback Reports". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5446 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Martijn van der Lee <[email protected]> Section: B.2 Original Text ------------- Authentication-Results: mail.example.com; spf=fail [email protected] Corrected Text -------------- Authentication-Results: mail.example.com; spf=fail [email protected] Notes ----- The TLD of the spammer's emailaddress should be `.net` as in the rest of the example. Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC5965 (draft-ietf-marf-base-06) -------------------------------------- Title : An Extensible Format for Email Feedback Reports Publication Date : August 2010 Author(s) : Y. Shafranovich, J. Levine, M. Kucherawy Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Messaging Abuse Reporting Format Area : Applications Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
Regards, John Levine, [email protected], Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly _______________________________________________ marf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
