Hi, Weldon! On Sep 15, Weldon Whipple wrote: > > >> 2. FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK FOR DATABASE dbname; > >> > > This would be difficult to implement. > > > > FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK is not implemented in a way that can be > > generalized to support per-database locks :( > > I had guessed as much. (The method in my DB_BINLOG_MGR method that > implements that functionality consists of a mutex lock, a comment > about some sort of miracle happening, then a mutex unlock.) > > I wonder if there might be a way of inhibiting some user database > (temporarily) from changing ...
Might be, but I cannot think of any :( Were there a [more or less] easy way to do it, we would have got RENAME DATABASE long time ago. Regards, Sergei _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~maria-developers Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~maria-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
