Oleksandr Byelkin <[email protected]> writes: > 27.10.2011 15:29, Kristian Nielsen пишет: >> Oleksandr Byelkin<[email protected]> writes: >> >>> 26.10.2011 22:18, Michael Widenius пишет: >>> [skip] >>>> === modified file 'storage/pbxt/src/thread_xt.cc' >>>> --- a/storage/pbxt/src/thread_xt.cc 2010-09-28 13:05:45 +0000 >>>> +++ b/storage/pbxt/src/thread_xt.cc 2011-10-25 14:24:24 +0000 >>>> @@ -485,7 +485,8 @@ static void thr_free_resources(XTThreadP >>>> >>>> xtPublic void xt_bug(XTThreadPtr XT_UNUSED(self)) >>>> { >>>> - static int *bug_ptr = NULL; >>>> + static int *bug_ptr __attribute__ ((unused)); >>>> + bug_ptr= NULL; >>>> >>>> bug_ptr = NULL; >>>> } >>> Th code was super strange before, I left it strange :) I think it is >>> better to Percona to decide what to do with it (I sent them patch for >>> 5.3). >> Did you really send to Percona, or did you mean PBXT? Either way, PBXT it >> should be :) > Actually I sent whole patch to percona hoping they will take part they want. > > About pbxt - I was informed that nobody care about it, so did not do > special movement... In any case the patch is published and code was > preserved as it was :)
Ok, I misunderstood then. I thought you meant that you sent the above patch to thread_xt.cc to Percona, I just wanted to point out that this is PBXT code, not Percona code. Sorry for any confusion. - Kristian. _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~maria-developers Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~maria-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
