Hi, Pavel! On Jun 03, Pavel Ivanov wrote: > On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 10:50 AM, Sergei Golubchik <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Jun 03, Pavel Ivanov wrote: > >> I personally would prefer if MariaDB had performance schema not > >> compiled in by default. Then we wouldn't be frustrated every time > >> we upgrade and find out that the tarball doesn't compile without > >> performance schema (yes, 10.0.11 doesn't compile). > > > > This is easy to fix. I'll change one of our builders (that doesn't > > do release packages) to compile without performance schema. > > Thanks! A little off-topic, but please add also a builder that > compiles without XtraDB (compiles only with InnoDB) and runs the whole > test suite. There are problems in this area too (as in a couple of > XtraDB-only tests are not skipped appropriately).
Unfortunately, we don't have that many spare builders. :( I did not *add* a new builder to compile without performance schema - instead, I took one of the builders we only use for testing and reconfigured it to build without P_S. But I don't see another builder like that - every other builder has a specific role, either as a package builder or it runs specific tests that no other builder does. Regards, Sergei _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~maria-developers Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~maria-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
