Hi Sanja, yes, it is not a requirement to use true/false in C++.
I'd be Ok about my_bool if not one glitch: it can evaluate to anything that char can evaluate to. C99 bool behaves more as expected: <quot> _Bool (also accessible as the macro bool) - type, capable of holding one of the two values: 1 and 0 (also accessible as the macros true and false). Note that conversion to _Bool does not work the same as conversion to other integer types: (bool)0.5 evaluates to 1, whereas (int)0.5 evaluates to 0. </quot> I'd vote for bool/true/false everywhere if I were sure about it's portability and about sizeof(_Bool) stability. Regards, Sergey On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 11:02:16AM +0200, Oleksandr Byelkin wrote: > On 23.04.15 10:14, Sergey Vojtovich wrote: > >Hi! > > > >According to MySQL coding guidelines: > >https://dev.mysql.com/doc/internals/en/additional-suggestions.html > > > ><quot> > >* In C code, use TRUE and FALSE rather than 1/0 > > > >* In C++ code, it is OK to use true and false (do not use 1/0). You can use > >C++ > > bool/true/false when calling C functions (values will be safely promoted > > to > > my_bool). > ></quot> > > "It is OK" == "it is allowed to use it." (about true/false) > > you have not use 1/0 > > and TRUE/FALSE must in C and OK in C++ (there is no other told) > > So I should carefully check what code it is or just use TRUE/FALSE? > > I prefer TRUE/FALSE everywhere. > > [skip] _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~maria-developers Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~maria-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
