Hi, Sergey! On Apr 16, [email protected] wrote: > revision-id: 0520a009c7139c940ab92345054bf0dba7808b11 > parent(s): eb059cd41e5553597f81fd90ad55c07d76d317ce > committer: Sergey Vojtovich > branch nick: mariadb > timestamp: 2015-04-16 18:38:26 +0400 > message: > > MDEV-7964 - delete_dynamic() takes 0.12% in OLTP RO ... > diff --git a/sql/sql_base.cc b/sql/sql_base.cc > index 0e9f668..d36de7f 100644 > --- a/sql/sql_base.cc > +++ b/sql/sql_base.cc > @@ -4240,9 +4233,17 @@ thr_lock_type read_lock_type_for_table(THD *thd, > DBUG_RETURN(true); > } > > - if (! (flags & MYSQL_OPEN_SKIP_SCOPED_MDL_LOCK) && > - schema_set.insert(table)) > - DBUG_RETURN(TRUE); > + /* Scoped locks: Take intention exclusive locks on all involved schemas. > */ > + if (!(flags & MYSQL_OPEN_SKIP_SCOPED_MDL_LOCK)) > + { > + MDL_request *schema_request= new (thd->mem_root) MDL_request; > + if (schema_request == NULL) > + DBUG_RETURN(TRUE); > + schema_request->init(MDL_key::SCHEMA, table->db, "", > + MDL_INTENTION_EXCLUSIVE, > + MDL_TRANSACTION); > + mdl_requests.push_front(schema_request); > + }
As far as I understand, the Hash_set was used here to make only one MDL request per schema. Now if you'll have 10 tables all in one schema, you'll make push 10 MDL requests instead of one. Which may be fine, if MDL subsystem places only one lock in this case (iirc, it does). But what is cheaper - collapse identical schemas into one mdl request here (with Hash_set) or let mdl sort it out later? > mdl_requests.push_front(&table->mdl_request); > } Regards, Sergei _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~maria-developers Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~maria-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
