Hi,
On 11/07/2016 08:59 PM, Vicențiu Ciorbaru wrote:
Hi!
I'm wondering if it makes sense to have an automatic cleanup process for
branches older than X months?
Please don't do that. It happens that some work is delayed for really
long period of time.
Neither the first (by date) nor the second (by MDEV status) list are
suitable for the automatic process. The third one (branches that are
fully merged) might be, but it should be considered carefully, I don't
have sufficient git expertise to decide if it's reliable enough.
We can potentially add some exceptions for work that needs to stay.
How would it work? When you create a branch and work on something, you
don't know yet that it would be delayed. Then it is, you think it's for
a week maybe, switch to something else, and you won't remember to
revisit the branch until the task comes back to life... Who would care
about making it an exception, and when?
Regards,
/E
Regards,
Vicențiu
On Mon, 7 Nov 2016 at 18:54 Sergey Vojtovich <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi!
ALL BRANCH OWNERS: PLEASE REVIEW AND CLEANUP YOUR STALE BRANCHES AT
https://github.com/MariaDB/server/branches/yours
IT SHOULDN'T TAKE MORE THAN A FEW MINUTES!
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 04:59:44PM +0100, Kristian Nielsen wrote:
...skip...
> Right, that was the intention of my mail, Cc:'ing the top
committer in each
> branch (sorry I seem to have forgotten to Cc: you).
>
> Or do you have a better way to determine who is the branch owner of a
> particular branch?
Top committer is fine.
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~maria-developers
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~maria-developers
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~maria-developers
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~maria-developers
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
