Hi, Sujatha!
On Apr 09, sujatha wrote:
> > It looks that CONNECTION_RETRY_COUNT is 86400.
> > And 86400 is clearly a timeout, not a retry count.
>
> Regarding the timeout, actually the above table just displays the user
> specified connection configuration.
>
> In case, user has not provided any value for 'CONNECTION_RETRY_COUNT' it
> will hold the default value(86400).
Indeed,
{"master-retry-count", 0,
"The number of tries the slave will make to connect to the master before
giving up.",
&master_retry_count, &master_retry_count, 0, GET_ULONG,
REQUIRED_ARG, 3600*24, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0},
this doesn't make any sense, why would retry *count* be set to the
number of seconds in a day? It's confusing. Is master retrying every
second?
If not - would you mind changing it to 80000? or 100000? Or something
else, whatever you like.
> >> diff --git a/mysql-test/suite/rpl/include/rpl_deadlock.test
> >> b/mysql-test/suite/rpl/include/rpl_deadlock.test
> >> index e9191d5fcd8..bccbe044a36 100644
> >> --- a/mysql-test/suite/rpl/include/rpl_deadlock.test
> >> +++ b/mysql-test/suite/rpl/include/rpl_deadlock.test
> >> @@ -59,6 +59,16 @@ let $status_var_comparsion= >;
> >> connection slave;
> >> SELECT COUNT(*) FROM t2;
> >> COMMIT;
> >> +
> >> +--echo
> >> +--echo # Test that the performance schema coulumn shows > 0 values.
> >> +--echo
> >> +
> >> +--let $assert_text= current number of retries should be more than the
> >> value saved before deadlock.
> >> +--let $assert_cond= [SELECT COUNT_TRANSACTIONS_RETRIES FROM
> >> performance_schema.replication_applier_status, COUNT_TRANSACTIONS_RETRIES,
> >> 1] > "$slave_retried_transactions"
> >> +--source include/assert.inc
> > what's wrong with simple
> >
> > SELECT COUNT_TRANSACTIONS_RETRIES > $slave_retried_transactions FROM
> > performance_schema.replication_applier_status
> >
> > ?
>
> 'asserts' are preferred by upstream team and they find asserts to be
> more readable rather than comparing SELECT OUTPUTS from result files.
I know. I always disliked assert.inc as mysqltest is perfectly capable
of comparing the expected result with an actual one and failing the test
on any difference. In fact, it's what mysqltest was written for in the
first place. assert.inc makes the result look prettier at the expence of
making the debugging much more difficult. Which, in my opinion, is a
wrong tradeoff, because nobody cares how pretty the result file is as
long as the test passes. But when the test fails, it's debugging that
matters.
But as we don't have a coding style that says "don't use assert.inc",
it's ultimately up to you.
Regards,
Sergei
VP of MariaDB Server Engineering
and secur...@mariadb.org
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~maria-developers
Post to : maria-developers@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~maria-developers
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
