Am 16.02.2015 um 22:53 schrieb Vadim Pestovnikov:
Thank you Reindl. So basically what that means is that mariadb is not 100% compatable with percona and mysql?
define 100% - replication is a *binary log*if it would be identical in every aspect it would exist only one product and even if all docs pretend 100% compatibility i would never come to the idea even run different minor versions in a replication setup
just follow these instructions leads to the conclusion mix different products is a bad idea: http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/replication-upgrade.html
P.S.: i don't appreciate off-list replies
On Feb 16, 2015 1:23 PM, "Reindl Harald" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Am 16.02.2015 um 22:19 schrieb Vadim Pestovnikov: Error in Log_event::read_log_event(): 'Found invalid event in binary log', data_len: 44, event_type: 33 Error reading relay log event: slave SQL thread aborted because of I/O error My slave is MariaDB 10 with data and logs partitions encrypted by LUKS and with SSL enabled. As far as RDS and Percona servers don't use SSL I am using non SSL user for the replication. Any recommendations or suggestions would be extremely appreciated don't mix different server versions in replication setups there is a good reason why it is recommended always to update first the slaves, run "mysql_upgrade" and then the masters to be 100% sure that the maste rnever don't write anything into the binlog the slave won't understand because differences in details
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~maria-discuss Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~maria-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
