With local MariaDB 10.0.13. out put from SQLyog "Messages"in erface: http://faq.webyog.com/content/8/147/en/how-shall-i-understand-the-_query-execution-time_-that-sqlyog-gives-me.html
*1 queries executed, 1 success, 0 errors, 0 warnings* *Query: SELECT BENCHMARK(50000000, (SELECT 1))* *1 row(s) returned* *Execution Time : 0.267 sec* *Transfer Time : 0 sec* *Total Time : 0.267 sec* Yes, I recently had a terrific machine. Intel socket 1155 (2 threads per core) 4 cores 3.5 Ghz,32 MB RAM. :-) GPU is nothing particlar. It is a 512 MB DDR2-RAMGeforce card (used in order to achive 2560*1440 screen resolution , what the intel CPU graphics does not provide. -- Peter On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Justin Swanhart <[email protected]> wrote: > You probably have either a faster CPU or bigger cache on your cpu. How > long does benchmark select 1 take? You should find it is faster on your > system too, right? > > --Justin > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Mar 3, 2015, at 6:18 AM, Peter Laursen <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Your 3rd test case takes 2:02 in MariaDB 10.1 and 2:13 in MySQL 5.6 on my > system (when otherwise idle) . > > -- Peter > > On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 1:58 PM, Federico Razzoli <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> I made some quick test to show what I mean by "performance problem". Note >> that I'm not saying the the first and the second test cases should perform >> equally. But there is too much difference - see the conclusion. >> >> 1) >> >> MariaDB [test]> SELECT BENCHMARK(50000000, (SELECT 1)); >> +---------------------------------+ >> | BENCHMARK(50000000, (SELECT 1)) | >> +---------------------------------+ >> | 0 | >> +---------------------------------+ >> 1 row in set (0.42 sec) >> >> 2) >> >> DELIMITER || >> CREATE FUNCTION f() >> RETURNS TINYINT >> BEGIN >> RETURN 1; >> END || >> DELIMITER ; >> >> MariaDB [test]> SELECT BENCHMARK(50000000, (SELECT f())); >> +-----------------------------------+ >> | BENCHMARK(50000000, (SELECT f())) | >> +-----------------------------------+ >> | 0 | >> +-----------------------------------+ >> 1 row in set (2 min 5.70 sec) >> >> 3) >> >> DELIMITER || >> CREATE FUNCTION f(x TINYINT) >> RETURNS TINYINT >> BEGIN >> RETURN x; >> END || >> DELIMITER ; >> >> MariaDB [test]> SELECT BENCHMARK(50000000, (SELECT f(1))); >> +------------------------------------+ >> | BENCHMARK(50000000, (SELECT f(1))) | >> +------------------------------------+ >> | 0 | >> +------------------------------------+ >> 1 row in set (3 min 35.20 sec) >> >> -- Conclusions: >> >> Times in seconds: >> >> 0.42 >> 125.70 >> 215.20 >> >> I don't know which ratio would be acceptable, but the difference betweem >> a trivial query and a trivial function is too high. >> Also, the difference between 2) and 3) is that the function in 3) accepts >> and returns a parameter. Again, the performance difference seems to me too >> high. >> >> Regards >> Federico >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~maria-discuss >> Post to : [email protected] >> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~maria-discuss >> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >> > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~maria-discuss > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~maria-discuss > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~maria-discuss Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~maria-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
