Hi, Justin! On Mar 03, Justin Swanhart wrote: > So uhmm, use a new parser. Like the one antony wrote in LLVM? :) I > mean, we would like to have window functions, CTE, and all those other > fun things. SQL-92 is a not relevant anymore.
In MySQL times we've tried to replace a parser. Twice. Antony has spent a year on that - that was one of the attempts. We're still using the old one, so neither project was a success. And Oracle started "parser refactoring" in 5.7, but they're doing it piece-wise now, not trying to replace everything at once. And they'll have to stay with bison this way. What I mean - we very much want to use a new parser. We really do. But it's just such a huge project :( Regards, Sergei _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~maria-discuss Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~maria-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
