Hi, Reindl! On Jul 13, Reindl Harald wrote: > https://mariadb.com/kb/en/mariadb/mariadb-1027-changelog/ > > i thought xtradb is gone in 10.2.x > > is it back now with 10.2.7 or is the changelog a random wild mix of > commits with no context to the version of the release?
Neither. Changelog is generated as "all commits that are present in the 10.2.7 history, but were not present in the 10.2.6 history". And all commits in 10.1 are merged into 10.2 eventually (because many 10.1 bugfixes apply to 10.2 too). So whatever was done to XtraDB in 10.1 it will be part of 10.2 revision history, even though XtraDB itself is disabled in 10.2 (and does not even compile there). I agree that it's confusing, but what can we do? Manually filter out all commits that contain the string "xtradb" from the changelog? > Revision #546a89ca58 2017-05-18 16:16:18 +0300 > Update xtradb and innodb version to 5.6.36 > > Revision #f880200974 2017-05-20 17:47:07 +0300 > After-merge fix: Correct the 32-bit XtraDB result diff. > > Revision #fe291c687d 2017-05-20 08:43:25 +0300 > After-merge fix: Correct the XtraDB result diff. > > Revision #4df726e180 2017-07-10 00:05:06 +0300 > storage_engine subsuites should also be disabled for XtraDB Regards, Sergei Chief Architect MariaDB and secur...@mariadb.org _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~maria-discuss Post to : maria-discuss@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~maria-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
