Hi Waylan,

Thanks for your input. Good point. Making them inline code is a good suggestion. At the moment we're using ruby BlueCloth implementation of Markdown which has a problem with backtick support (single backticks cause an error, so I'm filtering them out at present), but that is besides the point.

You are right that a faq entry should alert users to this issue, but for many users I think we can rely on them not reading the faq.

Personally I would like to avoid having to type the backticks in because I can't think of any situation where I would actually want embedded italics, but then I can also see that if embedded bold works, it makes sense to have consistent functionality for italics.

Hmm. The other issue for me is that we include auto_linking in our system, on top of markdown, and thus underscores in urls get italicized and break the auto_linked urls, but again that's an issue peculiar to us, although I'm not sure why markdown doesn't just autolink urls, since I can't think of many situations where I wouldn't want a url auto_linked - I guess if it was a dummy link or something. And what if I want the link text to be the link title. Right now I have to do:

[http://mysite.com/place_me_here.html](http://mysite.com/place_me_here.html)

which is a bit of a pain.

Just thinking out loud ...

CHEERS> SAM


Waylan Limberg wrote:

I don't have anything to add to the italics policy, but when using
file names and table names within a body of text, wouldn't they be
considered inline code[1]? In my experience that is usually how
documentation is formatted. That being the case, one would do:

   `my_fave_file.txt`
   `user_workspaces_tbl`

which, IMHO makes the italics policy irrelevant in this case. True,
you may have users who fail to use the backticks to start with, but
the problem is easy to spot and a simple addition to your FAQ page
should cover those issues.

[1]: http://daringfireball.net/projects/markdown/syntax#code



_______________________________________________
Markdown-Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/markdown-discuss

Reply via email to