Le 19 oct. 2006 à 18:05, Jacob Rus a écrit :
I think that John's objection that this is not visible enough is not a strong enough reason to change the syntax to something that in the majority of cases is worse (i.e. would look ugly), and is only an improvement in the rare case of two consecutive code blocks, which can be quite sufficiently worked around by using the blank line convention).
John's proposal wasn't to change the syntax, but to create a second, parallel syntax which can work in these situations. The old syntax for code block would still work everywhere it works currently, the new one could be used in ambiguous cases.
I'm not sure if John opposes the two blank lines rule or not; what I'm sure is that he opposes taking into account the invisible indentation of these blank lines into account. And I agree with that position.
Michel Fortin [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.michelf.com/ _______________________________________________ Markdown-Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/markdown-discuss
