Michel Fortin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 5/2/07 at 11:32 PM: > I wouldn't change the default for the reasons John has > enumerated. But I wouldn't remove the configuration option so > easily either so people can still choose the HTML 4 syntax if > they like. HTML 5 accepts both syntaxes as conformant in the > current draft, a good middle ground in my opinion.
Agreed all around. I should say that while I thought about getting rid of the HTML4 option, I didn't really consider it too strongly. I do think that the changes coming with HTML5 make it even less necessary than before, but if you really want to produce valid HTML 4.01, Markdown shouldn't stop you. -J.G. _______________________________________________ Markdown-Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/markdown-discuss
