On 7/8/07, Michel Fortin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Le 2007-07-07 à 11:12, John Gruber a écrit :
True, but if you read between the lines, it is already insinuated that that is the way things work. I know that's the way I initially understood it. It was only after a few errors (in my typing) that I realized the extra line break isn't always necessary. I just considered it sloppy typing -- I'd say that unless there is something somewhere that specifically says it's supposed to work without the blank line, then we should expect the blank line to be there. Anything else is just a sloppy/lazy author, which we can't make exceptions for. But maybe that's just me. For that matter, I believe python already is pretty strict about requiring the blank line between any block-level constructs. There may be an exception or two in a few minor edge cases, but that's it. I'd say python is ahead of the curve on this one. -- ---- Waylan Limberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Markdown-Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/markdown-discuss
