> On Jan 21, 2008, at 8:49 AM, tchomby wrote: > > > What do people think of this? > >
> > http://www.humanized.com/weblog/2006/06/30/collaboration_made_simple_with_bracket_notation/ On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 09:31:04AM -0500, Fletcher T. Penney wrote: > It's an interesting idea - as mentioned in the comments the brackets > would need to be changed to something else that doesn't collide with > current (or future) Markdown syntax, but I like the concept. I'm fairly late to the game (and I wrote a C markdown before I started reading this list, so I'm not exactly in the mainstream) but the syntax described on humanized seems incredibly noisy. Wouldn't the editorial corrections markup fit better as a footnote? I'd think that something like [text](ed: change -- why), like so: They called to say that [they're](ed: was `their` -- be careful with "their" and "they're") coming over in [a](ed: was `an` -- `an` is only before a vowel) quarter-hour. might be a little more readable than the thicket of []'s that Mr. Raskin proposed. -david parsons _______________________________________________ Markdown-Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/markdown-discuss
