> Anyway, a spec for Markdown Extra would contain a spec for Markdown as > well, wouldn't it?
I think the whole enterprise would be a lot more valuable, if we produce a combined spec, which would be self-contained, and call it Markdown 2.0. I don't think we necessarily need a formal grammar. What we need is to create a document, starting with "Markdown Syntax" perhaps, throw a bunch of questions at it, settle on the answers, incorporate them into a spec. Perhaps we can use the wiki at http://markdown.infogami.com/ for this. (BTW, I just cleaned up the wiki removing links to unrelated sites and reorganizing the rest into what seemed like a more coherent set of categories.) - yuri -- http://sputnik.freewisdom.org/ _______________________________________________ Markdown-Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/markdown-discuss
