Sorry for the delay in responding, the weekend happened - and it mostly involved moving my brother in law house rather than reading email...

On 29 Feb 2008, at 16:04, david parsons wrote:

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Tomas Doran  <[email protected]> wrote:
Text::Markdown *does not* extend the original Markdown syntax *in any
way*.

    Yes.   you said "and Text::MultiMarkdown" which provoked
    my comments.  I'm sorry -- I  misunderstood you.

No worries :)

They're actually using the same codebase, and currently Text::Markdown is a reasonably nasty hack to switch all the MultiMarkdown additions off...

In the longer term, I'm trying to find a more parser-like way of doing things, so that each module becomes just a composition of a number of 'features'. You can then trivially extend (or even build your own variant of a makrdown-like language) by compositing the features differently to one of the default dialects..

But a complete parser re-write is a long way off (as I don't have that much time), but whilst I'm slowly getting there - it'd be great to have a spec / test suite evolve from the community that was solid enough that I had confidence that the rebuilt parser was going to "do the right thing" in the same way as both the original and other implementations..

    What I'd love, too, is to see is to have the spec nailed down and
    blessed by John Gruber, at the very least so people don't have to
    trawl through markdown.discuss and 30 or so individual
    implementations to figure what the state of the art is.   It's
    somewhat less ego-ridden than replacing the reference spec.

Spec and test suite, but yes, totally.

As I've already stated, I'll be jumping on any bandwagons that emerge from this discussion, as will a number of the other people on the list who are maintaining markdown implementations, so I'm extremely pleased, as 'the community' seems to actually be moving forward in a really positive way. :)

Cheers
Tom

_______________________________________________
Markdown-Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/markdown-discuss

Reply via email to