On 29 Feb 2008, at 05:17, Michel Fortin wrote:
Le 2008-02-28 à 18:04, Yuri Takhteyev a écrit :
Perhaps there is a need for a better _perl_ implementation (or a few,
competition is fun), but as far as "official" goes, we need a
comprehensive and up-to-date spec and a test suite against which all
implementations could be measured.
I'm maintaining MDTest for that. If anyone wants a new test case to
be added to MDTest, I'll gladly accept it. If anyone wants to
dispute one of MDTest's expected result, I'm open to discussion,
preferably on this list so that everybody can take part.
As promised, here are the results of MDTest 1.1's Markdown tests
against Text::Markdown's trunk code (what is going to be 1.0.18,
should be exactly the same for the to be released 1.0.17):
tdpb:~/Text-MultiMarkdown t0m$ perl -Ilib t/50mdtest-markdown.t
1..24
ok 1 - use Text::Markdown;
ok 2 - Docs test: Amps and angle encoding
ok 3 - Docs test: Auto links
========================================================================
========
DIFFERENCES: + = processed version from .text, - = template from .html
@@ -101,7 +101,6 @@
<p>Minus: <code>\-</code></p>
-
<p>These should get escaped, even though they're matching pairs for
other Markdown constructs:</p>
not ok 4 - Docs test: Backslash escapes
# Failed test 'Docs test: Backslash escapes'
# at /Users/t0m/Text-MultiMarkdown/t/20fulldocs-multimarkdown.t
line 25.
ok 5 - Docs test: Blockquotes with code blocks
ok 6 - Docs test: Code Blocks
ok 7 - Docs test: Code Spans
ok 8 - Docs test: Hard-wrapped paragraphs with list-like lines
ok 9 - Docs test: Horizontal rules
ok 10 - Docs test: Images
ok 11 - Docs test: Inline HTML (Advanced)
ok 12 - Docs test: Inline HTML (Simple)
ok 13 - Docs test: Inline HTML comments
ok 14 - Docs test: Links, inline style
ok 15 - Docs test: Links, reference style
ok 16 - Docs test: Links, shortcut references
ok 17 - Docs test: Literal quotes in titles
ok 18 - Docs test: Markdown Documentation - Basics
ok 19 - Docs test: Markdown Documentation - Syntax
ok 20 - Docs test: Nested blockquotes
========================================================================
========
DIFFERENCES: + = processed version from .text, - = template from .html
@@ -136,13 +136,14 @@
<li><p>Third</p></li>
</ol>
-
<p>This was an error in Markdown 1.0.1:</p>
<ul>
<li><p>this</p>
-<ul><li>sub</li></ul>
+<ul>
+<li>sub</li>
+</ul>
<p>that</p></li>
</ul>
not ok 21 - Docs test: Ordered and unordered lists
# Failed test 'Docs test: Ordered and unordered lists'
# at /Users/t0m/Text-MultiMarkdown/t/20fulldocs-multimarkdown.t
line 25.
ok 22 - Docs test: Strong and em together
ok 23 - Docs test: Tabs
========================================================================
========
DIFFERENCES: + = processed version from .text, - = template from .html
@@ -1,8 +1,9 @@
<blockquote>
-<p>A list within a blockquote:</p>
-<ul>
-<li>asterisk 1</li>
-<li>asterisk 2</li>
-<li>asterisk 3</li>
-</ul>
+ <p>A list within a blockquote:</p>
+
+ <ul>
+ <li>asterisk 1</li>
+ <li>asterisk 2</li>
+ <li>asterisk 3</li>
+ </ul>
</blockquote>
not ok 24 - Docs test: Tidyness
# Failed test 'Docs test: Tidyness'
# at /Users/t0m/Text-MultiMarkdown/t/20fulldocs-multimarkdown.t
line 25.
# Looks like you failed 3 tests of 24.
So, the *only* things that Text::Markdown currently fails on are
small whitespace changes..
The cases where I have *too many* line breaks I think could do with
fixing, and I'll have a look at how trivial (or not) that turns out
to be..
In the other cases, I think that Text::Markdown's behavior is
*superior* to that of the original Markdown / what the test cases
expect. What do other people think?
I'll shortly be going through the other test cases that I've got of
my own / with the module to see if I can add some to MDTest, and I'll
propose those in a separate mail to the list..
Cheers
Tom
_______________________________________________
Markdown-Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/markdown-discuss
