Le 2008-03-22 à 21:15, Fletcher T. Penney a écrit :
Any reason for including Text::MultiMarkdown and not the official MultiMarkdown itself?
Hum, because I just took what was bundled with Text::Markdown; it was easier that way and I though it was the same thing just packaged differently. Perhaps I shouldn't have.
It would be useful for finding any areas where the two versions differ from each other, in addition to where MMD differs from other implementations.
But should we expect any difference? I agree that I should be using the official MultiMarkdown -- and I've added it now --, but is it still worth keeping Text::MultiMarkdown then?
This looks like a fantastic tool, in either case - thanks for sharing it.
You're welcome, and I'm glad you like it. Michel Fortin [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://michelf.com/ _______________________________________________ Markdown-Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/markdown-discuss
