> I'll second that. Though it would be best if we could still use the > Markdown name; a different one would just make one more confusing > text-markup specification for people to ignore. If we could call it > Markdown2 or something similar, it would be obvious that it expands on, > and supersedes, the original Markdown.
Required reading: http://six.pairlist.net/pipermail/markdown-discuss/2008-February/thread.html#1021 http://six.pairlist.net/pipermail/markdown-discuss/2008-February/thread.html#1031 http://six.pairlist.net/pipermail/markdown-discuss/2008-March/thread.html Of course, there are many many other relevant threads, but this would give you a taste. - yuri _______________________________________________ Markdown-Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/markdown-discuss
