I use Markdown in a homegrown wiki, thus use "wiki". I have come across
other Markdown wikis that don't use an extension at all. Since generally
where needed the extension can be custom defined, why do we need a
"standard" anyway?
On 06/11/10 06:59 PM, Brett wrote:
Here are the results from the limited data set provided. It looks like
'markdown' is the winner followed by 'mdown'. Third place is a tie between
'text' and 'md'.
If usage sets a standard, then 'markdown' is the standard.
Used by Multiple Sources
------------------------
* markdown - BBEdit, Elements, GitHub, Gruber<http://tinyurl.com/25bzct8>,
TextMate
* mdown - Elements, GitHub, TextMate
* text - BBEdit, Gruber<http://tinyurl.com/2abbfjh>
* md - Elements, GitHub
Used by One Source
------------------
* mark - BBEdit
* mdwn - Elements
* mkd - GitHub
* mkdn - GitHub
Suggested
---------
* mdtext
* mdtxt
* mtext
_______________________________________________
Markdown-Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/markdown-discuss
_______________________________________________
Markdown-Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/markdown-discuss
