> I'm looking forward to taking a look at your test and benchmark code. > (Of course I will have to tune pegdown to become the fastest of the three > implementations... ;) I finally finished my post on the performance of the JVM-based Markdown Processors:
http://henkelmann.eu/2011/1/10/performance_comparison_of_markdown_processor_for_the_jvm The performance of each processor heavily depends on the input, so I split up the test into various scenarios. In a mixed test Actuarius comes in first, followed by PegDown followed by Knockoff, roughly in a 1:2:4 Ratio. (My first test contained a lot of plain text which is processed well by Knockoff, yet when you mix in some emphasis, links etc. it Knockoff gets pretty slow.) I will release the testsuite ASAP. I am looking forward to the PegDown improvements, that will give me a reason to pimp up Actuarius a bit more :) Cheers, Christoph _______________________________________________ Markdown-Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/markdown-discuss
