Hi Tommy!
> I just must say that I have tried Fletcher Penneys version of multi > markdown recently. The 3.x version seems to me to be very suitable for the task of converting > to LaTeX, > which is slightly more complicated than converting to HTML. > Wow! I didn't know MultiMarkdown, but that is a great hint. Looks very promising and capable. Thank you! The Markdown entry on Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Markdown doesn't point to http://fletcherpenney.net/multimarkdown/ yet. But it probably should. > I have tried pandoc, but I find it far more easier to work with > multimarkdown. > > You should consider trying it. > I use Pandoc for my HaskellDown, because it is a Haskell library. It also is very powerful and impressive, and in my limited experience, I found it very stable and more reliable than e.g. PHP Markdown. Actually, I don't apply any of its nice features (like automatic toc generation) at all in the default markdownToHaskell converter, I just use all the Pandoc default settings, for the sake of simplicity. But I agree, Tommy, I, too, didn't find Pandoc itself easily accessible. Thank you, again. Thomas
_______________________________________________ Markdown-Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/markdown-discuss
