Hi all,
> This could be usefull in some cases, but you point out yourself, that there > is a solution with css. In my opinion the "title" attribute is mostly useless > and stupid, as it leads to [Mystery meat > navigation](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mystery_meat_navigation), which > sucks! I thougt about using the content title tag *as* caption. Not using the title tag in its origin way. But I think this will mix the title-tag and caption aka figure > I think the `<figure>` element is a good example for a semantic element. I > think it should be used; and I think it should therefore be implemented into > Markdown. I totally agree. I only talk about the markdown syntax, not the generated html. There for <figure> is great and the right thing. Mainly I suggested an extra value inside the Markdown image, after the title tag > Due to the lack of therapy, R. Ronald et al suggested another palliative > treatment ... > >  > ! **Some disease in a male patient**: See the *red* pustula, that explode > when touched. > ``` in this case I would write: ![some disease image](http://example.com/img.jpg "useful title" {**Some disease in a male patient**: See the *red* pustula, that explode when touched.}) But this will be only useful in images and not like your solution in all elements. And if you have much formatted text, very confusing. greetz klml _______________________________________________ Markdown-Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/markdown-discuss
