What are the arguments of those who do not want to introduce such a change?
It would be nice to make a part of the official Markdown definition then all implementation will display this in the same way. ST On Thu, 2013-07-04 at 16:16 +0200, Lasar Liepins wrote: > On 2013-07-04, at 16:06, ST <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I recently started to use Markdown and I really enjoy it. There is only > > one thing that bothers me - '_' in the middle of a word. For example > > some_file_name.txt will display "file" italicized which is annoying. Why > > not to ignore all "_" which are not followed or preceded either by a > > whitespace or by a newline? In this way file in some_file_name.txt will > > not be italicized but in some _file_ name it will. > > > > What do you think about sucha a change to Markdown? > > it has been discussed many times. It seems that the implementations > are fairly split on this point. Many already ignore Underscores > inside words: > > http://johnmacfarlane.net/babelmark2/?text=some_test_file.txt > > Greetings, > > _Lasar > _______________________________________________ Markdown-Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/markdown-discuss
