Right now, I don't think I would implement this particular syntax.
F- -- Fletcher T. Penney [email protected] On Jul 11, 2013, at 6:33 AM, Matthieu Codron <[email protected]> wrote: > From: "Fletcher T. Penney" > > I'm not sure I want to head down that path yet for MultiMarkdown. I'm not > ruling it out for all time, but I worry about the "cruft" vs "reward" balance. > > I understand your point of view. But I'd like to avoid future implementation > divergences ; so I'd like to hear you about the propoosed syntax : if you > were about to implement it in MultiMarkdown, would you adopt this syntax ? I > know you cannot give a definitive answer, but at least can you confirm it > seems good to you ? > > Thanks > > Matthieu > _______________________________________________ > Markdown-Discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/markdown-discuss
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Markdown-Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/markdown-discuss
