Am Sonntag, 24. November 2013, 16:59:42 schrieb Aristotle Pagaltzis: > * Mariusz Wojcik <[email protected]> [2013-11-24 09:10]: > > > What problem are you actually trying to solve? > > > > That Problem I want to solve is to have a Menu for my simple CMS. This > > Menu which is created with Markdown needs a specified class. I don't > > want to use all over there html tags. > > > > > Yours is a bad solution, but implies that what I provided before > > > didn't meet your needs. > > > > > > Is there a reason it didn't? > > > > Yes, I want to set the class of the `<ul>` element which doesn't work > > in Markdown style AFAIK. > > Uhm. > > You wrote all the <li>s and everything inside them in HTML already. If > you just wrote the <ul> tags around those, then Markdown would leave > your content alone. And you say you need to do it this way because you > need to put a special class on your <ul>s. But the problem is caused by > the fact that… you didn’t write your <ul>s there at all. > > This is incoherent. The only way I can make sense of it is if you’re > failing to say that the <ul> tags are to be supplied by your CMS, and > you must provide only the content between them. > > Is that the case? > > If so, then you’re out of luck with Markdown. If you use it, there is no > way to get just a bare block of <li> tags with nothing around them. It’s > not a use that it was designed for. > > If you are writing the CMS yourself then I’d suggest using Markdown and > doing something like .replace('^<ul>', '<ul class="whatever">') on the > output. > > If not, then try to find if you can turn of Markdown processing for the > navbar and just put in the raw HTML you had already written.
You are probably right. Lastly I have done the menu in the HTML Way which isn't very convient but it works. Thanks for all answers, Mariusz Wojcik _______________________________________________ Markdown-Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/markdown-discuss
