Also from a tool-chain perspective, XML (XHTML) is important.

On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 2:11 PM, Deirdre Saoirse Moen <[email protected]>wrote:

> EPUBs need to be valid XHTML, so it's still relevant.
>
> Deirdre
>
> > On Mar 6, 2014, at 11:57 AM, Alan Hogan <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > People still care about XHTML validation? HTML5 has done a much better
> job of unifying behavior across clients and tools everywhere.
> >
> > But maybe I misunderstand your point.
> >
> > Alan
> >
> >> On Mar 5, 2014, at 9:19 AM, Jak Wings <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Good idea. I have never thought of it. But it is a new element of
> HTML5, I have a little worry about it. I am not able provide a XHTML mode
> for it.
> >>
> >> Best regards,
> >> Jak Wings
> >>
> >>> On 3/5/14, 11:19 AM, Fletcher T. Penney wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Do you mean inline images vs <figure>'s?
> >>>
> >>> In MultiMarkdown, I started with no changes to Markdown's image
> >>> approach, but eventually added a feature that an image by itself as a
> >>> paragraph would be a <figure> rather than an inline image type.
> >>>
> >>> I have not surveyed users to see which is used more commonly, but I do
> >>> get a fair number of questions related to <figures>, and very few
> >>> related to inline images.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Fletcher
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> On 3/5/14, 10:18 AM, Jak Wings wrote:
> >>>> I'm designing my own Markdown-like language. :) I just don't know how
> important it is to use inline images. What do you think?
> >>>>
> >>>> Best regards,
> >>>> Jak Wings
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Markdown-Discuss mailing list
> >>>> [email protected]
> >>>> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/markdown-discuss
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Fletcher T. Penney
> >>> [email protected]
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Markdown-Discuss mailing list
> >>> [email protected]
> >>> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/markdown-discuss
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Markdown-Discuss mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/markdown-discuss
> > _______________________________________________
> > Markdown-Discuss mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/markdown-discuss
> _______________________________________________
> Markdown-Discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/markdown-discuss
>
_______________________________________________
Markdown-Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/markdown-discuss

Reply via email to