Marty, any relation to Galen? 

Dennis, I get what your saying about a version identifier, but it would be much 
more cost effective if the community agreed upon a standard (say, CommonMark, 
or whatever since it was proposed as such), and threw a big-fat-lint warning in 
front of whomever wrote non-conformant MarkDown.  Your solution puts the burden 
on the subscriber of a MarkDown blob (bit, squibble, rave, whatever you want to 
call it) to process it properly, while the burden should be on the publisher 
(assuming they want it to be consumed.) 

I don't know. Without tangentially philosophizing politics for too long,maybe 
it's  technocrats' responsibility to spackle the cracks in human-relations. 

In any event, if a MarkDown statement (?) could be passed around reliably via 
JSON or some other structure, then the "integrated" web we see today would at 
least bump a minor version number. 

Jim 

PS. As I write this, it occurred to me that this idea may target an outmoded 
form of Cumputer>Human interaction I.e. The keyboard. 

Sent from my iPhone

> On Jul 21, 2017, at 4:11 PM, Marty McGowan <marty...@fastmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Dennis,
> 
>    my interest in following this discussion, now that i see you here, just 
> went from observer, to tracker,   maybe even participant.
> 
>    i'm an emacs orgmode user.  are you?    i've used pandoc to convert *.org 
> to *.md (and some back again).   my criteria for using either:   OrgMode for 
> stuff not needing curating when i'm gone, Markdown for text I'd hope that 
> others will maintain.   in this latter category, i've collected the text from 
> my sister's genealogy work on Ancestry and am re-purposing it to live on 
> McGowans.Org
> 
>    Here's a tally by suffix of the files in this legacy:
> 
>   1 m4
>  65 md
>  58 mkd
> 341 org
>   1 src
>  66 txt
> 
> where the mkd (certainly) and the txt (likely) are Markdown, with src and m4 
> each having a spot.   so, it's Orgmode 341,  Markdown 191.
> 
>    any advice here?
> 
> Thanks,
> =*+*-  Marty McGowan  908 230-3739
> http://alum.mit.edu/www/mcgowan
> 
> p.s. bill and i had a live session yesterday about keybase, where i'm 
> applemcg.
> 
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017, at 11:01, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
> > It seems to me that the first thing to handle is coming up with a means
> > for identifying the version/variant/dialect/fork of "markdown" that a
> > file is coded in.
> >
> > I have been thinking that a variant of #! Would do it, but that's not
> > quite what that is used for (since it confuses format and the application
> > that is expected to process it).  (I am looking at #? Myself, but don't
> > have a clear proposal at
> >
> > I still think something like that is called for.  Have a way of
> > identifying the format of the text and, ideally, leading to where the
> > rules and definition can be found.  Have it in a form that can be
> > ignored, and still be forgiving when there is no such information and a
> > consuming software does the best that can be figured out.
> >
> >  - Dennis
> >
> > PS: I am looking at #? myself, for leading format specifying line(s).
> > Don't have a clear description so far, but there's more thinking at
> > <http://nfoware.com/notes/2017/02/n170201.htm>.  I will be using this for
> > some different formats that I want to introduce (having little or nothing
> > to do with markdown).
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Markdown-Discuss [mailto:markdown-discuss-
> > > boun...@six.pairlist.net] On Behalf Of Gerald Bauer
> > > Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2017 05:49
> > > To: Discussion related to Markdown. <markdown-discuss@six.pairlist.net>
> > > Subject: Fixing Markdown Series @ Manuscripts News
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > >     First thanks for the great mailing list service. Since I'm just
> > > talking to myself here this will be my last post on markdown list
> > > (never say never ;-) Anyways, they never come back, don't they?
> > >
> > >
> > >     If you follow along there are different ways to "fix" markdown:
> > >
> > [ ... ]
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Markdown-Discuss mailing list
> > Markdown-Discuss@six.pairlist.net
> > https://pairlist6.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/markdown-discuss
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Markdown-Discuss mailing list
> Markdown-Discuss@six.pairlist.net
> https://pairlist6.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/markdown-discuss
_______________________________________________
Markdown-Discuss mailing list
Markdown-Discuss@six.pairlist.net
https://pairlist6.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/markdown-discuss

Reply via email to