Well, thanks for the feedback! I think you're right about the version number, I think it doesn't fit too well for this purpose, I put it there for adding something to the composition (although I liked the "folding corner" version). Now I modified the splash and wallpaper replacing the ubuntu brand logo with the GUADEC logo (I think there'll be no problem, right?), which luckily matched the orange color the ubuntu logo had, so the images still have some of their values. How about these ones?
Splash version A: http://img4.imageshack.us/img4/6164/gnomelivecdsplash27vh.png Splash version B: http://img4.imageshack.us/img4/2149/gnomelivecdsplash32dq.png Wallpaper 1024: http://img4.imageshack.us/img4/5245/gnomelivecdwallpaper10246zp.png 2005/8/16, Andreas Nilsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Luis Villa wrote: > > >On 8/12/05, YetZero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >>Here, I have my entries. I tried sending them last week, but I had to > >>wait for moderator confirmation to send the images to the list as an > >>attachment. Well, they didn´t come at all, and I found where to upload > >>them. Here they are: > >> > >>http://img238.imageshack.us/img238/1740/gnomelivecdwallpaper10248re.png > >>http://img238.imageshack.us/img238/9638/gnomelivecdsplash4ut.png > >>http://img238.imageshack.us/img238/9227/gnomelivecdbootsplash6sq.png > >> > >> > > > >I really like these! I'm not sure why exactly, but they seem less > >overwhelmingly blue than Andreas's mockups, which is really nice. > > > >I have no idea how I should decide; suggestions from the artist types > >welcome :) > > > > > Ok, that seems to be me, so here I go. > > http://img238.imageshack.us/img238/1740/gnomelivecdwallpaper10248re.png > Nice, however, I would like to loose the Ubuntu-branding in this and the > gnome-splash. It's needed in the bootsplash to pay tribute to ubuntu for > providing the base for the livecd, but not to the extent that it is > present in all three images. It needs to be clear that this is a GNOME > live cd first and foremost. > > http://img238.imageshack.us/img238/9638/gnomelivecdsplash4ut.png > Could you try to loose the stripes behind the foot to get a cleaner feeling? > > http://img238.imageshack.us/img238/9227/gnomelivecdbootsplash6sq.png > I really like this one. I get a little distracted by the 2.12 in the > corner though. Perhaps you could just mention it in the background and > then we could replace the 2.12 letters in the background with something > else in cases where the versioning is less important, like the GUADEC > livecd. > > Anyway, exellent stuff! > I would really like to see this on the final cd. > > Someone might have some objections about the blue tint, but I think it > looks so good I want to keep it this way for now. Nothing wrong with > having something that feels stable and robust, even if it can be > imprented as cold and don't stick out among other desktop enviorments > (win, kde and osx are blue aswell). > > - Andreas > -- > marketing-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing-list > -- -Luis Santander -- marketing-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing-list
