> I don't think this is of much value to the developers. They do tend to > read web site comments when we do major releases, so reiterating the > comments doesn't help them much.
i don't know which developers do read this stuff and which ones don't, so this list was supposed to be a summary of all that. it wasn't just "reiterating the comments" but compiling them; what i read was 100x bigger than my list. > Some analysis of what opinions are > representative, and/or what leads people to these opinions, might be > useful, but that's a big job that would normally happen over at > [email protected], and would normally involve two-way communication > with users. i think there was some of that analysis in my compilation (i didn't just paste everything), but there weren't many ways to achieve two-way communication with the people who posted these suggestions / complaints / etc. > Most of the stuff at the end of this list is outlying stuff that does > not belong in any overview. and that's why i put that in the end and labeled it "not so common and/or relevant" :) > If this process is going to work in future, I guess that developers > would like to see > - Top 3 major negative perceptions. (and maybe which of our "target > markets"/personas those affect most) i've included a top 5; is that too much? about the markets/personas, well... most of these comments come from pretty much the same "persona" (young techie who reads sites like slashdot). -- Santiago Roza Departamento I+D - Thymbra [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- marketing-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing-list
