--- Quim Gil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It is stated in that document that all pages should > conform to XHTML 1.1. I think this is a bad idea > unless you want to keep out Internet Explorer users > since XHTML 1.1 requires the web server to send the > MIME type application/xhtml+xml instead of the usual > text/html. Internet Explorer only offers its user to > download the file in that case.
Looking at the wikipedia article on XHTML, the only advantage of 1.1 I can see is: This version also allows for ruby markup support, needed for East-Asian languages (especially CJK). Is this an important advantage? (By the way: an extra use case for the website: "Is gnome available in language x?" I can't currently find this from the site.) Are there any other advantages? Can we get an idea of what proportion of visitors to wgo use IE, perhaps from server logs? It might be fair to suppose that most of our audience already use a free browser even if they are on windows, but then this would exclude people who might happen to want to access the site from work, a library, a web cafe, etc. ___________________________________________________________ To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo! Security Centre. http://uk.security.yahoo.com -- marketing-list mailing list marketing-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing-list