On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 23:58 +0200, Andreas Nilsson wrote: > Elijah Newren wrote: > > On 9/4/07, Dave Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> Murray Cumming wrote: > >> > >>> I still don't see one apart from the usual "many usability > >>> improvements". "10 years of GNOME. 10 GNOME 2.x releases in 5 years"? > >>> > >> It's a nit, feel free to slap me... > >> > >> 2.0, 2.2, 2.4, ..., 2.20 = 11 releases in 5 years. 2.0 came out in June > >> 2002. > >> > > > > Slap! Now, it's your turn to slap me as I be even nittier...There > > have only been 10 GNOME 2.x releases in the last five years, as 2.0 > > came out before September 4, 2002. > > > > :-) > > > So we're going for this?
Probably not unless we want everyone to discuss our numerical error instead of talking about how wonderful we are. > I think I need to start drawing a splash screen for the w.g.o frontpage, > so it would be nice to have a agreement on this. > The ten-theme is nice, ten years of freedom, ten releases in five years! > Something cool could be written about our steady release schedule, that > other successful project have then copied from us and stuff like that, > always nice to brag about... :) We've been saying it for years, and we are now famous for it. I don't see much need to keep going on about it. Something more general and user-centric is probably appropriate. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com -- marketing-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing-list
