I second the targeting different types of users. I really think we need to
decide on a few niches and really target them. Accessibility seems like an
obvious one. Users that only use web would also be an easy one but perhaps
hard to reach without a lot of money to throw at press.

Some others:
- The mobile space. This is the carriers, OEMs, hardware providers, chip
vendors. (Intel and ARM both do a lot of advertising.) Plus Nokia,
Supersonic Imagine, Garmin, etc.
- Netbook manufacturers/distributors. GNOME apps are being used on Dell,
Asus, and HP netbooks.
- Schools.
- Governments.
- Accessibility hardware and software manufacturers. (Braille printers,
keyboards, pointers, mice, cameras, etc.)
- Device manufacturers (like digital cameras, scanners, etc.)

I think we should list all we can and pick a few (2-3) that we are going to
focus on. We can have a plan for all of them but perhaps we need to invest
in a couple.

Stormy

On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Luis Villa <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 10:36 AM, Paul Cutler <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > I'll grab the easy one:  Users
> >
> > So far we have:
> >
> > * Users
>
> As Brian was saying, users is too broad. Lord knows I love all of
> them, but we're probably best off focusing on specific groups of users
> that are within reach. An offhand list:
>
> * accessibility-challenged users. (dash of realism: the last time we
> tried to do this seriously, the answer was 'you people haven't
> actually tried to *use* your a11y software, have you.' We need to make
> sure that is not the case this time.)
>
> * enterprises: 2.0 had a successful message in this space: cheap,
> reliable, easy-to-train-on b/c easy to use but not too dissimilar to
> Windows. 3.0 will have a harder time because it will likely lose the
> 'fairly similar to windows' tag, but the other things should still be
> strong.
>
> * relatedly to the previous, w/ similar issues: pre-existing gnome 2.x
> users generally. Need to convince them that the upgrade and changes
> are worthwhile. Not all of them will be on board, but we need to
> enlist them- get them to be our biggest cheerleaders, both by selling
> them on the new stuff but also (importantly) explaining to them what
> changes were made and why. They are going to lose features they liked;
> we have to explain to them why the new ones are better. If we do that
> well they'll turn around and tell others.
>
> * free software influencers: convince them that gnome 3 Is The Future
> of the Free Software Desktop. (again, have to actually execute really,
> really well, and have a persuasive story for this one.) But this is an
> important group of users to acquire. (Here I will again drag out my
> old proposed GNOME slogan: 'GNOME: the Heart of the Free Software
> Desktop.')
>
> * college compsci students: these are the next wave of our developers;
> lets reach out to them at a time when they have lots of time and
> energy to experiment. Ideally this branches out from not 'just'
> marketing into educational and training outreach- get them to work on
> gnome projects and such, like Mozilla does.
>
> * 'low functionality' windows users- windows users who live 95% in
> their browser already (lots of parents, grandparents here- don't use
> many apps, don't use many peripherals). Pitch them on having firefox,
> and the rest being virus free and easy to use.
>
> * (if somehow the product blows our minds): normal windows users.
> focus on security but also the awesome new features. Again, depends on
> actually having awesome new features, and (ideally) a suite of apps
> that integrate them. b/c both of these are still somewhat
> hypothetical, a major push on this front may have to wait.
>
> HTH-
> Luis
>
> > * Linux distributions
> > * Media
> > * Developers
> >
> > Who else comes to mind?
> >
> > Paul
> >
> > On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 6:59 PM, Paul Cutler <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Luis, this is perfect, thanks for kicking it off!
> >>
> >> Paul
> >>
> >> On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 6:47 PM, Luis Villa <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Paul Cutler <
> [email protected]>
> >>> wrote:
> >>> > Hello marketing team!
> >>> >
> >>> > As we think about GNOME 3.0, who are our target audiences?  (Who
> should
> >>> > the
> >>> > marketing team be bulding messages for?)
> >>>
> >>> I know I've written on this before, but I can't find it. :(
> >>>
> >>> Because I'm short on time, some important audiences that we have
> >>> tended to forget at times in our marketing:
> >>>
> >>> * Distros: the reality is that they make the default choice that
> >>> determines what most of our users see. If we don't sell them on 3.x,
> >>> our users will continue to use 2.x, as simple as that.
> >>>
> >>> * Linux Media: the various and sundry Linux media have a big say in
> >>> what people perceive as 'the' Linux Desktop. Sadly, this is a fairly
> >>> dysfunctional media, so telling them 'here is why Real People are
> >>> going to be sold on 3.0' is a sometimes, but not always, effective
> >>> technique.
> >>>
> >>> * Developers: they need to know why they should integrate with GNOME
> >>> technologies, and particularly with whatever new ones we come up with.
> >>> We need them to buy into it to build our ecosystem.
> >>>
> >>> Sorry I can't be more verbose-
> >>> Luis
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > marketing-list mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing-list
> >
> >
> --
> marketing-list mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing-list
>
--
marketing-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing-list

Reply via email to