Le vendredi 15 janvier 2010, à 13:44 +0100, Andre Klapper a écrit : > Am Freitag, den 15.01.2010, 12:24 +0100 schrieb Vincent Untz: > > Hi Stormy, > > > > Le mercredi 13 janvier 2010, à 10:28 -0700, Stormy Peters a écrit : > > > I've heard quite a few concerns from very happy users that GNOME 3.0 is > > > all > > > about GNOME Shell and will force them to use GNOME Shell. For example, see > > > this thread that a Friend of GNOME sent me: > > > http://gnomesupport.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=13782. > > > > FWIW, I thought it was pretty clear, but it looks like it's still not: > > gnome-panel & metacity will be available for use with GNOME 3.0 (they > > probably wouldn't be part of 3.0 officially, I'd say, although we didn't > > really discuss this), so people would still be able to use the old look > > and feel for a while. > > As with every change, there's a lot of confusion and sometimes wrong > press about it (after reading some comments on articles in online tech > magazines on GNOME 3). > Beside wrong stuff like "They will remove nautilus and force us to use > zeitgeist/journal" and the classic "Please don't repeat KDE 4.0" I've > also seen a lot of "We cannot use gnome-panel and metacity anymore, and > gnome-shell needs powerful hardware that I don't have" comments. > > It cannot hurt at all to clarify things here by communicating better and > more often what GNOME 3 means and especially what it won't force users > to do to reduce FUD.
Oh, yes, I agree. It's really just highlighting that we're not doing a good job at communicating :-) Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. -- marketing-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing-list
