Thanks all. :) I've made some minor changes, and removed the part of breakage Stormy indicated below and sent it to the Linux Format person.
sri On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 12:09 PM, Stormy Peters <[email protected]> wrote: > I too think you did a great job! > > On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Sriram Ramkrishna <[email protected]>wrote: > >> >> For the most part, a GNOME 2 application can exist in a GNOME 3 >> environment. We continue to maintain the same GTK+ api from GTK+ 2 although >> they are deprecated while providing newer API for application programmers to >> use. The advantage is that applications developers can move to GNOME 3 at >> their discretion. This is in contrast to the GNOME 1.x to GNOME 2.x where >> we broke all APIs and application writers had to re-write their applications >> from scatch. >> > > I think I would remove "we broke all APIs and". It will still say the same > thing. > > Stormy > >
-- marketing-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing-list
